Loading...

E-Scooter and E-Bike Accidents in Utah: Who’s Liable When You’re Hurt?

Utah Law Explained — E-Scooter and E-Bike Accidents in Utah: Who’s Liable When You’re Hurt?
UTAH LAW

E-Scooter and E-Bike Accidents in Utah: Who’s Liable When You’re Hurt?

Comparison guide to fault, insurance, city liability, and rider rights after Utah micro-mobility crashes

Electric scooters and e-bikes are now a regular part of Utah streets, trails, and college campuses. They are quick, convenient, and affordable for short trips. But when a crash happens, liability can be anything but simple. Utah blends traffic rules, product-safety principles, rental-app contracts, and insurance laws to decide who is responsible.

This guide explains how fault is assigned when an e-scooter or e-bike crash occurs in Utah, how comparative negligence works, and what injured riders should know about claims involving drivers, cities, and rental companies.

01

How Utah Law Looks at E-Scooter & E-Bike Crashes

When a micro-mobility crash happens in Utah, there is rarely a single automatic answer to who is liable. Courts and insurers look at the same basic negligence questions they ask in car and bike cases, but apply them to newer technology, rental platforms, and city infrastructure.

Key questions include:

  • Did a driver, rider, pedestrian, or city employee act unreasonably under the circumstances?
  • Did a defective scooter or e-bike part contribute to the crash or injuries?
  • Did poor road, trail, or sidewalk conditions play a role?
  • What do the rental-app terms say about responsibility and waiver of liability?
  • How should fault be divided under Utah’s comparative negligence rules?

Under Utah law, an injured rider can still recover compensation even if they were partly at fault, as long as they are not 50% or more responsible for the crash.

02

Comparison Guide: Who Is Liable in Common Crash Types?

Rider vs. Car or Truck Driver. When a vehicle hits an e-scooter or e-bike, the driver is often largely at fault if they failed to yield, ran a light, or turned without checking for riders. However, riders must also obey traffic signals and lane markings. If a rider speeds through a red light or crosses mid-block, a Utah court may assign a share of fault to the rider.

Rider vs. Rider (Scooter vs. Bike or Two Scooters). Collisions between riders are evaluated like traditional bike-on-bike crashes. The negligent rider is typically responsible, which may involve weaving through pedestrians, riding too fast on crowded sidewalks, or failing to use lights at night.

Rider vs. City or Road Conditions. Sometimes the main problem is a broken sidewalk, a missing warning sign, or a dangerous unmarked drop on a trail. In those cases, a Utah city or county may carry some responsibility, but claims against government entities must follow strict notice and timing rules under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act.

Rider vs. Scooter or E-Bike Malfunction. If the brakes suddenly fail, the throttle sticks, or a steering column collapses without misuse, liability may fall on the rental company or the manufacturer. These cases can involve product liability questions and maintenance records kept by the company.

Rental-App Contract Terms. Rental platforms often include liability waivers, speed warnings, and rules about where you can ride. Not every waiver is enforceable in Utah, but the language in these agreements can affect how insurers and courts view a rider’s expectations and responsibilities.

03

Scenario Breakdown: Real-World Utah Crash Examples

Scenario A: Car Hits You in a Salt Lake City Intersection. A driver turning left fails to see an e-scooter in the crosswalk and causes a serious injury. If the rider had the walk signal and was within the crosswalk, the driver is usually primarily at fault. If the rider rolled into the intersection against the signal or from between parked cars, a portion of fault may shift back to the rider.

Scenario B: You Lose Control on a Broken Sidewalk. A rider hits a crumbling section of sidewalk, is thrown forward, and suffers a head injury. If the defect was significant, known to the city, and not corrected, there may be a claim against the municipality. But to pursue it, the rider must follow shortened government-claim deadlines and prove more than a minor surface flaw.

Scenario C: The Scooter Malfunctions Suddenly. A rental scooter’s brakes fail on a downhill stretch, causing a high-speed crash. Here, maintenance records, inspection logs, and reports from other riders can be crucial. If the company knew or should have known about the problem, it may be liable. If the defect began at the factory, the manufacturer might be involved as well.

Scenario D: Another Rider Plows into You. A fast-moving e-bike cuts through a shared trail, clips your rear wheel, and sends both of you to the ground. That rider can be held responsible just like a negligent driver, especially if they were speeding, weaving, or ignoring lane markings. In some cases, both riders may share blame.

Scenario E: A Driver Forces You to Swerve Without Contact. A car drifts into the bike lane, forcing an e-scooter rider to swerve and crash without direct impact. These “no-contact” crashes can still be compensable if witnesses, dashcams, or nearby security footage confirm what happened. Insurance issues can be more complex in this situation.

Scenario F: Nighttime Crash Without Lights. A rider is struck after dark while riding without lights or reflectors. Even if the driver was speeding or distracted, riding without required lighting may cause a court to assign a portion of fault to the rider, reducing any eventual recovery.

Each scenario turns on specific facts, evidence, and how Utah’s comparative negligence rules allocate responsibility between everyone involved.
04

Quick Rights: What Injured Riders in Utah Should Know

After an e-scooter or e-bike crash in Utah, riders have more rights than many people realize. A few key points:

  • You may still recover damages even if you were partly at fault, as long as you are not 50% or more responsible under Utah’s comparative negligence standard.
  • Police reports, witness statements, photos, and medical records can be critical for proving fault and documenting injuries.
  • Rental scooters and e-bikes often keep GPS, speed, and maintenance logs that can help show how the device was used and whether it malfunctioned.
  • Claims against cities and government entities have shorter notice deadlines than standard personal-injury claims and are easy to miss.
  • For most private-party injury claims in Utah, the statute of limitations is typically four years, but government-related timelines can be much shorter.

Knowing these basics can help riders avoid mistakes in the first days and weeks after a serious crash.

05

Insurance, Evidence & Deadlines After a Crash

Which Insurance May Apply? In many e-scooter and e-bike cases, the at-fault driver’s auto insurance is the primary source of compensation. In some situations, the rider’s own auto or homeowner’s policy may provide additional coverage, especially for underinsured or uninsured drivers. Rental companies may offer limited coverage, but it is often narrower than riders expect.

Evidence to Preserve Early. Helpful evidence can disappear quickly. Riders should try to:

  • Call police to create an official report whenever injuries or property damage are involved.
  • Photograph the scene, damage, road conditions, and any visible injuries.
  • Save screenshots from the rental app showing the ride, location, and time.
  • Collect names and contact information for witnesses and other parties.

Mind the Deadlines. Waiting too long to report a claim or seek medical care can give insurers an excuse to question the injuries. Claims against cities or counties often require written notice within a short period, so it is important not to wait until the last minute.

06

Common Pitfalls in Utah Micro-Mobility Claims

Some of the most common mistakes injured riders make after an e-scooter or e-bike accident include:

  • Assuming that signing a rental-app waiver means there is no possible claim.
  • Leaving the scene without calling police or collecting basic information.
  • Failing to photograph the defect, hazard, or vehicle that caused the crash.
  • Not getting prompt medical evaluation, which makes it easier for insurers to argue the injuries are unrelated.
  • Missing shortened deadlines when a city, county, or public agency may be partly responsible.

Avoiding these pitfalls can significantly improve an injured rider’s ability to pursue fair compensation and hold the right parties accountable.

07

Video & Social Learning Hub: Utah E-Scooter & E-Bike Accidents

Injured on an E-Scooter or E-Bike in Utah?

Knowing how Utah assigns fault in e-scooter and e-bike crashes can help you protect your rights, preserve important evidence, and pursue fair compensation. Every case turns on specific facts, insurance policies, and deadlines.

Talk to a Utah Injury Attorney

For more plain-English legal guidance, stay updated with Utah Law Explained, explore our mission on the About Us page, or connect with trusted counsel like Gibb Law Firm.

Utah Law Explained is built to make Utah law simple and approachable. We publish plain-English guides so Utahns can make informed decisions about everyday legal problems, including new issues like micro-mobility crashes and e-scooter injuries.

Team ULE - All Rights Reserved 2024